About Writing: Symbolism

February 25th, 2010

I like Ken Levine. His blog is great and he’s written some amazing sitcoms. One of them is MASH, a sitcom so huge it has had the academic treatment.

Every so often I’ll read an article or term paper or passage in a book that references a MASH episode my partner and I wrote. The piece is most always complimentary; sometimes overly so. But invariably the authors will analyze the episode. They’ll identify the symbolism, how when Hawkeye hangs up his laundry he’s really representing the Anti-Christ, and they’ll find all kinds of mythological parallel, subliminal messages, and odes to other works of literature. They’ll compare Klinger to Jane Austin, find significance in jeep license plate numbers, and detect hidden codes in Radar’s dialogue.

I’d like to be able to shrug my shoulders and say yes, all of that is in there. David and I write on many levels. Our scripts are challenging intellectual puzzles to be solved by only the most advanced sophisticated minds. Thanks for noticing.

I’d like to say that but it’s all bullshit!

Read the whole thing here.

I think textual analysis is a fun tool, but nothing more. I remember writing an essay about how the lighting in Die Hard symbolised the Jungian concept of the shadow self. I didn’t believe a word of it, and had fun taking the piss.

This made me think of some of the imagery I deliberately wrote into a script a few months ago, none of which anyone noticed. They were more interested in the characters being unlikeable and the dialogue stilted.

There’s a lesson in there somewhere.




Share and Enjoy:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Print
  • email

Thought Vomit #122: ft. A Shit’s Trick

February 23rd, 2010

Pressure is mounting on the BBC’s Political Editor to resign this evening, as Nick Robinson stoically refuses to deny allegations of bullying and bias.

Since Friday evening, Nick Robinson has been unable to quash the clamouring calls for his ousting, amid accusations that he once ate a junior reporter’s face, and that his reporting is skewed by his prior involvement with the Tory Party.

Nick Robinson

Questions about Nick Robinson's face eating just won't go away, because I keep asking them, again and again

All weekend and well in to Monday, the talk in our house was that Nick Robinson, famed for his balding head and stupid delivery, was seen to pin down James Landale and proceed to gnaw his chops off. Now, while none of us actually witnessed this event, one senior source in the kitchen says that he knows a man who knew a woman once who said this actually happened.

But what’s interesting, and it’s what’s got us all atwitter, is that neither Robinson, nor any of his associates, has actually denied this event ever took place.

Sure, on Monday evening, Robinson was seen on the Six O’Clock News stoically not talking about the claims circulating around my head that he once feasted on a colleagues lips, but what’s noteworthy is that at no point during his life has he outright denied these allegations.

Once more, no one is actually saying he did this, and there’s no actual evidence to support the claims, but it’s telling that he hasn’t come out and forcefully demonstrated his innocence.

But does the public care? Some people I’ve spoken to have shrugged and asked me who is this speccy slapper I’m making them look at, but just as vociferously, some people might think it’s make or break time for the BBC’s Political Editor.

And on the wider question of how this is going to affect his coverage of the election, well, it’s long been an open secret that Nick Robinson likes the taste of another man’s cheeks.

This isn’t a scandal. Yet. But if enough people start asking questions and insinuating dreadful scenarios, and if we pose enough rhetorical questions, will this become something bigger? And will Nick Robinson have to face some tough questions in the coming days? Or will one final question with an opposing view make it seem like a thoroughly biased and skewed editorial is actually a balanced piece of journalism?

Only time will tell.




Share and Enjoy:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Print
  • email

Thought Vomit #121: ft. He Can Go On Like This

February 12th, 2010

Have you met Andy Coulson? He’s a nice guy. One of Changey Dave’s™ new, more huggable Conservatives. As Director of Communications, I’m sure he had a hand in the poster campaigns and slogans that tell us it’s time to make Britain better.

And as Editor of the News Of The World, he presided over a “culture of bullying”, which lead to a settlement of nearly £800,000 for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. The victim of this bullying was sports writer Matt Driscoll. As The Guardian says:

According to the tribunal, the bullying continued after Driscoll went on sick leave. Senior management at the paper sent Driscoll a barrage of emails, phone calls and visited his home to demand that he see a company doctor, despite Driscoll’s GP advising him to “distance” himself from the source of his stress.

Are all Directors of Communication sent on a Malcolm Tucker course?

Malcolm Tucker

Fuck a pot noodle

But maybe you remember the News Of The World phone hacking scandal? Their royal correspondent Clive Goodman was found guilty of intercepting voicemail messages. Andy Coulson has repeatedly said he does not recall any of his journalists being involved in hacking anyone’s voicemail. He may have even said the same thing to a Parliamentary committee.

But it’s all old news. The convictions were bought, hands were wrung, water under the bridge.

That said, according to Nick Davies, it’s not.

In a series of reports over the past year, he has uncovered what could be characterised by some as a culture of voicemail interceptions at the paper, and found that the private investigator at the heart of the intercepts, Glenn Mulcaire,

was highly prized for his skills and that he was at the heart of the paper’s investigations unit and was a guest at dinners and parties. Senior figures from the paper, however, insist that they knew nothing of this. Andy Coulson, told the media select committee he had never met Mulcaire nor even heard his name during his six years at the paper. The paper’s legal adviser, Tom Crone, also said that he had never heard of Mulcaire until he was arrested in August 2006.

The interception of voice mail messages is an imprisonable offence, and Davies’ findings directly contradict the official version of events as outlined by the paper and its then editor.




Share and Enjoy:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Print
  • email

Episode Eighty

February 12th, 2010

Still catching up:

Episode Eighty

According to my notes, this week we talked about Pulp Fiction, Alan Titchmarsh, P Diddy, novelty football pitches, breasts and pork scratchings. But in reality it was an excuse for me to do a load of bad impressions of Tarantino dialogue in a Bruce Forsythe stylee.

Sundays Supplement

Now in Colour




Share and Enjoy:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Print
  • email

About Writing: Dealing With Rejection

February 12th, 2010

I was waiting on a pass/go from a producer this week, and it occurred to me that the worst part was the not knowing. I was more deflated not hearing anything than I was with the inevitable rejection. It didn’t help that I knew the exact moment of the meeting which discussed the notion either.

It slipped me into neutral actually. I began to wonder if it was worth starting on something new in the meantime, if it meant abandoning it straight away. So I did nothing instead. Unless eating a house full of crisps counts as writing of course.

Rejection

When I Googled "Rejected" all I got was a 404 error code

I’ve always liked to kid myself that professional rejection doesn’t bother me, but it’s slightly disingenuous to say that. Of course it does, how could it not? Months of work rejected in an email that hasn’t even been spell-checked. But what was nice, is that the moment I got the pass, it kicked me up the bottom to get on with something else.

The best rejections are the ones that offer up good, understandable reasons for the decision. And those are the easiest to accept. If, like this one, they even help you shape your next pitch or treatment, all the better.

If you’re new to writing and you’ve just received your first rejection letter, use it as a spur not a crutch. A string of such letters can obviously be disheartening, but I don’t think you can call yourself a writer if you haven’t had rejections. Aaron Sorkin may disagree. You should aim to get a pile of them that’s taller than you.




Share and Enjoy:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Print
  • email