Archive for the ‘Writing’ Category

Thought Vomit #111: ft. Blue Socks

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

I went shopping for socks. It’s not the most romantic use of my time I know, but I needed some socks, so I thought the best way to procure some socks would be to go to an establishment that traded socks in exchange for monetary recompense. The way I saw it, my feet were cold, and the best way to combat this decline in pedal temperature, would be to own some kind of tight fitting cotton sheath, shaped like my foot. After some research, I discovered that such things did exist. These things are called socks.

Now, this posed me a dilemma that I could not readily rectify. My feet were cold, it was cold outside, going outside would make my feet more cold, but to stop my feet being cold I had to go out into the cold with my cold feet. If only I had some socks.

In desperation, I turned out my drawers in search of socks, and to my chagrin, all I could find was a matching pair of tubular shaped blue cotton material with a kind of dog leg in them. At one end of these odd floppy devices was an elasticated band, at the other end, they were sealed into what can only be described as a toe-like finale.

These are not my legs

These are not my legs

This being the best I could do, I began wrapping these things around and round my cold feet, and to my surprise, their coiled cotton contours did provide me with some kind of warm respite. The only trouble now was, I couldn’t actually get my feet into my shoes.

Thus I faced a second dilemma that I could not readily rectify. My feet were warm, but the ground outside would hurt my warm feet without some kind of rubber soled protection. If only I had bigger shoes.

But in order to get bigger shoes, I would have to go outside. And in order to go outside, I would need to remove the warm material protecting my cold feet from the cold outside. It seemed to me that what I needed was a more snug fitting cotton coating, contoured to the shape of my feet. If only I had some socks.

I made a rash decision. I tore the blue coiled material from my now warm feet, and pushed my naked podiatry into the confines of my normal sized shoes. That’s when I realised the foolhardiness of this action. The edge of my normal sized shoes was chaffing my ankle. What I needed was some kind of soft cushioned protection tightly bound to the shape of my ankle to prevent said ankle from being rubbed raw. If only I had some socks.

These are my legs

These are my legs

A moment of inspiration hit me hard in the teeth. I took the strange blue material I had rescued from my drawers, and jammed them down the side of my shoes, thus providing some padding against the skin incendiary chaffing. This did have the effect of rendering the shoes a little too tight to make walking comfortable. If only I had bigger shoes.

I stepped out into the cold and could feel the chill freezing my under-protected toes. An extra layer around my feet at this moment would have been enough to thwart this frosting. If only I had some socks.

I found myself wandering aimlessly through the commercial district of my town, thinking forlornly if I would ever find what I needed. And suddenly, there it was.

The … Sock … Shop.

Elated and breathless I staggered awkwardly across the threshold of the boutique, my senses bombarded with hundreds upon hundred of what can only be described … as socks.

Aimlessly grabbing armfuls of the bounteous booty, I lunged at the counter and tendered my purchase. It seemed an eternity as the bored cashier rang them through the scanner, each beep a mocking reminder of my sock free feet. Finally, she looked up and informed me of the cost. If only I had some money.

I’d left all my cash back home, tucked inside a sock.

* * *

What you’ve just wasted your time reading is a good example of how NOT to write stand up material. It’s overly verbose, not worth the journey, lacking in the funnies and almost impossible to memorise.

What’s ridiculous is that I did write it as a piece of stand up, and even attempted to perform it once.  But in the telling of it, almost all of it got cut out live on stage, which left the bare bones and a sort of essence of it. I wrote it as a dare, after Iszi challenged me to write a bit about “Blue Socks”; an aribtrary phrase she pulled out of her bottom. When she read it, she correctly stated it was a plethoric mound of dirge, which is why I went on stage and did it. I’m an idiot.

The final joke got a big laugh though, so I somehow win.




Thought Vomit #107: ft. Crickets

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

I’ve just watched a segment on The Culture Show in which Toby Young laments the decline of the critic. It was so massively wide of the mark, it might as well have been about Aberdeen.

It began with Young talking about how critics used to be famous, revered and feared; about how they used to waltz from showbiz party to showbiz party, before moving on to blame the internet for the critics’ loss of stock. What highlighted the cringe-worthy attitudes of the presenter were the level-headed interjections of better writers than he.

While each argued that criticism was about ideas and good writing, Young kept returning to themes of fame and ranting, and never once touched on the actual craft of criticism.

What’s more, he took a pop at the age of an internet-based movie critic and accused him of lacking worth because he sometimes received freebies from PR companies. If Toby Young has never done that, I’ll happily inflate a tramp with my lips. What was clearly an attempt to undermine his subject back-fired spectacularly though because the kid was articulate, insightful and amusing. Everything a good critic should be. Take note Mr Young.

But perhaps the worst moment came when he began reading out the reviews of his latest television show. Sitting there, bathed in the glow of Twitter, he read us some of the more blustery congratulations, and betrayed his own argument by being pleased that “amateurs” were saying nice things.

Sometimes criticism is much more entertaining and enlightening than its subject matter, and when that happens it’s fantastic. After the segment ended, it cut back to Mark Kermode, who seemed a bit bewildered by the whole thing, before simply reiterating the point that had been totally lost on Young; a critic’s job is to write well.




Thought Vomit #89: ft. Setting Is Not Situation

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

Have you ever found yourself uttering the sentence, “I have an idea for a sitcom, it’s set in a …” with a suitable epithet? While there is of course no right or wrong way to begin writing a sitcom, it’s worth bearing in mind that the setting is not the situation. Indeed, the setting should really be there to enhance the situation.

My favourite example of this distinction is Blackadder. Over the course of its four series, the setting changed dramatically, but the basic situation remained the same. Edmund Blackadder wanted to climb the social ladder, whether it was in the court of Elizabeth, or to escape the trenches of the Great War.

But in each case, the setting served the situation. Blackadder was positioned so he could easily see his own place in the world.

So, if your main character wants to be the greatest baker in the world, it only makes sense to set everything in a bakery. If your character wants to be rich by this time next year, by all means have him be a three-wheeler dealing market trader with not much nouse.

It could work in reverse of course. Maybe you really want to write about your life at an abattoir; and a perfectly acceptable sitcom it could make just from that one single idea. But it can only serve to enhance matters by having that setting inform your character’s situation. What if your slaughterhouse executive secretly wants to be a serial killer?




Thought Vomit #88: ft. Tweets From A Tiresome Twat

Monday, August 24th, 2009

Twitter is useless. Totally useless. But I love it. And it’s an excellent playground for the insomniac. What with being addicted to that for the last day or two, I’ve been neglecting to vomit forth, so here’s a few stupid tweets I’ve chundered up (hashtags are a topic, it makes sense really):

#sexyshakespeare Romeo Does Juliet
#sexyshakespeare Two Gentlemen IN Veronica

#LifesLittleMoments The need to scratch your anus whilst looking at bacon in a supermarket.

My local is sweet and very quiet. It’s a Wispa Bar.

The police left me beneath some snooker equipment. I was under a rest.
Wanking into a condom at the Crucible. A good safety shot.

#sexycomputergames Grand Theft Auto Erotica.
#sexycomputergames Tony Hawk’s Reacharound

Sesame Street has been accused of using slave labour. Police raided the children’s television workshop.

@sighdone if you are interested.

In September, the plan is to overhaul my website and use it to host these Thought Vomits (though they’ll still end up here). First I need to research how easy it is to migrate from Fasthosts to Heart Internet, and then I need to decide if I want to use WordPress or Joomla, so any thoughts on that would be much appreciated.




Thought Vomit #83: ft. Dragon’s Balls Xtra Large

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

Charlie Brooker, on his excellent You Have Been Watching, asked why it is that Dragon’s Den is so popular. This is a question I’ve asked myself in the past week or so, albeit in a more personal form. I have outright pleaded with people why I can’t stop watching it. One response nearly got to the crux of the matter, or so I thought, when Sam replied that he, like me, enjoys a show that makes him angry.

That much is true, and there is something distinctly ball shrivelling about the Dragons themselves. They look like they’ve gorged on the cock of a smug beast, and now have a belly full of smugjaculate. I half expect Duncan Bannatyne to whip out his member and measurably compare it with the people before him, while Theo Paphitis has all the wit and charm of a boiled egg that has been forcibly inserted into the anus of a dead rat. The less said about Deborah Meaden the better, while the other one has the presence of a year old fart. That leaves Peter Jones, a man who could hump a lamppost and make the light feel sleazy.

But for all that, I finally figured out why I find it so appealing. It’s basic fundamental story telling. You could use a segment of it to teach narrative. A protagonist enters the Den, with a MacGuffin that drives the plot forward, wanting something that is difficult but not impossible to attain. Meanwhile, the antagonists offer up many obstacles for our hero to face, and if he overcomes them, the prize is the resolution. The Dragon’s also have a clear agenda; something they want that they may have to buy.

The details of the business are window dressing, because the viewer is more interested in the fundamental narrative elements that are already in place. And we also spend a lot of our time during the relentless and redundant voice overs wondering if Meaden is sitting there in a pool of her own piss.