Archive for the ‘Thought Vomit’ Category

Thought Vomit #132: ft. Gizmo Would Not Have Stood For This

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

If you listen to Sundays Supplement, you may have heard my rant about this already, but I don’t care; this bugs me a lot.

The Rambo quadrilogy is a feat of sequential numbering that will make your bum burn.

If someone says to you they’ve just watched Rambo, don’t ask them which one; you could be there for a week. And it’s not a film worth that much of your time.

The first Rambo film is called First Blood. It was released in 1982.

The sequel is called Rambo: First Blood Part II, and was released in 1985.

So far, so sensible enough.

Ramgizmo

If you feed Stallone after midnight he turns in to this

The next film released was in 1988, and it was called Rambo III.

What?

The 1988 release should by rights have been called Rambo II: First Blood Part III.

Things get even worse with the fourth instalment, belatedly released in 2008. Instead of opting for the sensible Rambo III: First Blood Part IV, they decided to call it Rambo.

So, if someone says they saw Rambo last night, they could mean the first instalment (they’d be wrong), they could mean the second instalment (they’d be just about right), or they could mean the fourth (they’d be right).

But what if they clarify and tell you they mean Rambo 2. There is no Rambo 2. They could mean the second instalment, or they could be being pedantic and mean the third instalment. They could even bum-squelchingly mean the fourth instalment, it being the second film in their mind to be titled Rambo.

If someone says they saw Rambo 4, punch them in the nipples.




Thought Vomit #131: ft. I Did It Yahweh

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

Sometimes we don’t get enough time on the podcast to discuss some of the better articles in our supplements. I liked this one so much though that I’ve decided to reprint it in full, and hang the copyright implications.

I Did It Yahweh

It’s not often we journos get a chance to meet the actual man. You know, the one with the stick and all. That’s why we here at You were so chuffed when we ran in to Him on our travels. We took the opportunity to ask as many tough questions as we could, and what follows is dynamite stuff.

You don’t mind if I tape this do you?

Um … I’m not …

It just makes it easier to chat and not have to worry about taking notes.

Okay. I suppose.

Right good. I think the first thing our readers would love to know, is, as God, where do you buy your shoes?

Are you serious?

Of course. I mean, it’s hard enough for mere mortals to find a good pair, but what about God?

That’s your first question? Where do I buy my shoes?

Yeah. Why?

I’m God. You’ve managed to track me down and corner me into a universal exclusive with your magazine, I think most people would ask about the meaning of life, not where I purchase my footwear.

I think our readers would be more interested in shoes.

I know they’re more interested in the point of existence.

With respect God, I think I know what our readers want.

With respect, I’m omniscient.

I don’t know what that means.

I know.

God Shows Off His New No Beard Look

God Shows Off His New No Beard Look

Look, can we just carry on?

(God sighs (What a diva! – ed)) Go on.

Okay, you want something more meaty. Um … what’s it like being God?

Well, I’m not even sure I AM God anymore.

Ooh, a crisis of confidence, what’s bought this on?

You’re recording this interview. Given that absolute proof of my existence can only be gained through faith, a magnetic tape with my voice on it would suggest I’m not actually God.

Can I ask you about the shoes now?

No. Look. Here I am, the supreme being of the Universe, and I’m not even sure what I’m doing here.

Exactly. If God doesn’t know the point of life, then why should our readers care?

Good point. I hadn’t thought of that. Argh, so now it seems I’m not even infallible.

What does infallible mean?

(God looks worried) I don’t know.

Okay, so, why not just tell our readers the meaning of life?

Um … I don’t … is it? Is it a good pair of shoes?




Thought Vomit #130: ft. Ghostbusting

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

I have a Ghost.

He’s called Derek.

Every morning I wake up and find a pile of vomit under my socks, and a mysterious shortage of toast in the bread bin.

So I decided to try and capture said ectoplasmic apparition on film. Well, video.

Having invested in a new camera, I realised it didn’t have night-vision, so I spent the next week painting my entire house in a pale shade of green, and found a pair of inverse contact lenses.

I made a film during the day, but obviously nothing happened. So I just stared into the camera, breathless and scared looking, because I realised I’d ruined my carpets with the paint.

The resultant footage was fairly convincing, and I’ve always wanted to meet Yvette Fielding ever since she appeared in Seaview, so I sent it to Most Haunted.

When a producer arrived he was horrified by all the green ectoplasm plastered all over my home and furniture, so decided it would make a good episode.

But it turns out Yvette has quit the show because it doesn’t find enough ghosts. Instead, they sent that twatwagon Acorah around. Without any cameras. Or production staff.

Too Stupid To Straighten a Slinky

Venkmann never managed to stop him drilling a hole in his head

The producer just arrived with him on a leash, handed me the end of it, turned on his heels and legged it.

Now Acorah just wanders around the house jumping at any given noise and making stupid voices. Plus he shits on the couch.

And he gorges on toast every night, before puking it up in my laundry basket.

I hate my ghost. I wish Derek would fuck off.




Thought Vomit #129: ft. Her Majesty’s Deficit

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

The Queen arrived at parliament in a gold gilded coach, wearing a crown encrusted with jewels, and the first thing she said was that we need to save a bit of cash.

Well, the fourteen horse-mounted guards in their hand-stitched livery could go for a start. Not to mention the racist ventriloquist dummy who sits next to you.

The Maj is a Vag

Hope

The BBC were at great pains during the post-election negotiations to point out that the Queen tries very hard to stay out of politics. If our Head of State literally has no purpose, why do we still have one?

Because the Royal Family is good for tourism, Simon.

Fine. Then we should hand her a speech to read in which she announces that ‘her’ new Government will tackle the daunting deficit by privatising the Monarchy. They can fund their opulence by selling blow-up Princess Diana dolls, and those nudey photos of Princess Margaret.

HRH plc could be traded on the markets, and the CEO could be answerable to shareholders. Sod being a subject, I want a piece of the dividends.




Thought Vomit #128: ft. Ill-Thunked Thoughts On A Hung Parliament

Monday, April 26th, 2010

Why is everyone assuming that it’s the Liberal Democrats who will hold the balance of power in a hung parliament?

The Lib Dems choice clearly rests on how much electoral reform they can wrestle from any deal – so the presumption is that they will host a bidding war between Labour and the Conservatives. Thus the consensus is that we have seen the death of first past the post system.

The Tories have little to gain from a coalition, and a lot to lose. With a truly three-party system based on Proportional Representation, the Tories may not see power again for a generation – unless it’s they who offer up the most concessions.

I’ve read a few thoughts that the natural outcome of a Lab-Lib coalition is the bringing together of the centre left movement, while some people argue a Con-Lib coalition would see the end of Labour all together. It’s a good story to tell, and I can see why the media is so fascinated by it.

Hung or Hanged

Hung or Hanged?

There are voices within Labour that like the idea of uniting the two centre-left parties, not least Mandelson and Johnson, the former of whom would see it as the culmination of a project begun with the wooing of Paddy Ashdown.

But all this assumes that it will be a coalition involving Nick Clegg’s band of MPs.

If both the Tories and Labour have much more to gain from keeping the current electoral system, which they clearly do – why wouldn’t the two main parties join together and form a majority Government?

A Labour-Conservative coalition gives them both what they need – survival. Any coalition with the Lib Dems does not.